"Public Interest Litigation: Insights from Theory and Practice"
Fordham Urban Law Journal, Vol. XXXVI, 2009
UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 09-19
SCOTT CUMMINGS, University of
California, Los Angeles - School of Law
Email: [email protected]
DEBORAH RHODE, Stanford Law School
Email: [email protected]
In
the American struggle for social justice, public interest litigation has played
an indisputably important role. Yet over the past three decades, critics from
both the left and right have challenged its capacity to secure systemic change.
The critiques have varied, but have centered on two basic claims. The first is
that litigation cannot itself reform social institutions. The second related
concern is that over-reliance on courts diverts effort from potentially more
productive political strategies and disempowers the groups that lawyers are
seeking to assist. The result is too much law and too little justice.
These critiques, although powerful in their analysis of the limits of
litigation, have generally failed to adequately acknowledge its contributions
and the complex ways in which legal proceedings can support political
mobilization. This Article seeks to move beyond these critiques by situating
the debate over public interest litigation in a richer theoretical and
empirical context. In essence, our argument is that such litigation is an
imperfect but indispensable strategy of social change. Our challenge is to
increase its effectiveness through better understanding of its capacities and
constraints. To that end, we draw on two bodies of work: research on law and
social change, and research on social philanthropy. The first literature offers
a detailed empirical and theoretical picture of how lawyers mobilize law to
change institutional rules and redistribute power. In its empirical dimension,
this research explores the ideals and practices of public interest lawyers and
how their strategies are informed by where they work—non-profit public interest
organizations, large firm pro bono programs, plaintiff-side law firms, and law
school clinics. In its theoretical dimension, this literature draws on the
sociology of law and social movements to explore the interplay between legal
proceedings and political mobilization. A second body of work, which focuses on
strategic philanthropy, holds important insights for how public interest
organizations and pro bono programs can most effectively direct their social
reform efforts.
We draw a number of lessons from this research. The first is that litigation,
although a necessary strategy of social change, is never sufficient; it cannot
effectively work in isolation from other mobilization efforts. Second, money
matters: how public interest law is financed affects the kinds of cases that
can be pursued and their likely social impact. A deeper understanding of
financial constraints and opportunities in different practice contexts is
therefore critical to effective reform. A third key insight is the importance
of systematic evaluation. Only through more reflective assessments of the
impact of litigation can we realize its full potential in pursuit of social
justice.
For any folks invested in more and better resident contribution, that is a knock back, i believe. But strangely enough, the newest one-pager Can involve many responsibilities around consultation.
Posted by: Belstaff Jackets | November 26, 2011 at 01:12 AM